Summary of Results
Are the results reported without any interpretation first?
Are the results directly tied to the question, hypothesis or problem?
Did the author provide enough detail for you to independently check the results?
Is there enough description for you to interpret the results in context?
Notes:
Results are right at the front.
I think they were reporting extreme cases. Why generalize one client to all? We don’t know how that would hold.
Tied to the question? Yes
The whole thing about length of calls looks unsubstantiated to me.
No info on length of calls.
Seems there is enough data for me to interpret results, but I’m unhappy with the amount of contextual info.